Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is 1673 days newer than Xeon E5-2673 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 122 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2673 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
