Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2673 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 208 vs 194 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |