Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-2670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3353 days newer than Xeon E5-2670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 26% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2670 - 137 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 - 45 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2670
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
