Buy on Amazon
$1,150
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1589
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1589
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1485 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 120 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 19% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 169 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 48 vs 24 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD YD297XAZAFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24 Core, 48 Thread Processor, Pack of 1
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 12 | Cores | 24 |
| 24 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
