Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 9 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 115 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 3% better in Far Cry 6 than Xeon E5-2670 v2 - 97 vs 94 FPS
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Server |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |