Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2499 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 40% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2667 - 63 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 16 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2992 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |