Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 3353 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-2667 - 251 vs 210 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2667
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Intel Core i5-11260H |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
