Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500U is 2497 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Performs up to 41% better in League of Legends than Xeon E5-2667 - 97 vs 69 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2667
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 5 3500U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
