Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1495 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 407 vs 379 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
407
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |