Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v2 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v2 is 1984 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Phenom X4 9550 - 257 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
245
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | AMD Phenom X4 9550 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Phenom X4 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Agena |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 11.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |