Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2665 outperforms Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2665 is 789 days newer than Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-540 - 117 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 73 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
115 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |