Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 1938 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2660 - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 20 vs 16 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$392.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $392.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |