Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 3353 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2660 - 127 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Core i7-11800H |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Tiger Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 45 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |