Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 32% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2660 - 204 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |