Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9980HK outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9980HK is 1688 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9980HK - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9980HK
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 184 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2660 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-9980HK
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-9980HK |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
