Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 80% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 549 vs 305 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2660 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 24 |
| 20 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
