Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2149 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 113 vs 99 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10353 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |