Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 2186 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1125G4 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 25% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 163 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 28 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2660 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i3-1125G4
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-1125G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1449 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G4 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
