Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2679 days newer than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2650 - 401 vs 367 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
401
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10492 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |