Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2149 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 11% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 182 vs 164 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$286
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |