Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2136 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 105 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 10% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 274 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 32 vs 20 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
274
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$897.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |