Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100 is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 39% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 152 vs 109 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |