Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 outperforms Xeon E5-2643 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 and Xeon E5-2643 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2643
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 130 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Performs up to 10% better in League of Legends than Xeon E5-2643 - 79 vs 72 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 16 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2643
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Xeon E5-2690
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
