Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Xeon E5-2643 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-2643.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 31% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2643 - 202 vs 154 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |