Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2643 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2643.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 14% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2643 - 165 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2643 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |