Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 2783 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2640 - 184 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 24 vs 12 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12658 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |