Buy on Amazon
$1,300
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2820 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2640 - 154 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 48 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1300
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core, 48-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
