Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 7 days older than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 90 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 182 vs 181 FPS
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Haswell E |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
