Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Core i5-2520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 1315 days newer than Core i5-2520M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 30% better in F1 23 than Core i5-2520M - 192 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2520M - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2520M
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 35 vs 90 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-2520M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-2520M |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 1st, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 90 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
