Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500T outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11500T is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11500T - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500T
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 250 vs 228 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 35 vs 90 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-11500T
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 90 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 15.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
