Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 216 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 55 vs 90 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 90 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
