Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900H is 2016 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 201 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 45 vs 90 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Mobile • Mar 16th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 4900H |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 45 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 512SP |
No | Overclockable | No |