Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1068NG7 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1068NG7 is 2160 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-1068NG7 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1068NG7
- Performs up to 17% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 271 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 28 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-1068NG7
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Ice Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1526 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus |
| No | Overclockable | No |
