Buy on Amazon
$56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 242 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 9% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 243 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i5-4690 Processor (6M Cache, 3.5 GHz upto 3.90 GHz) BX80646I54690, CPU Only
Buy for $56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68709 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
386
32.40973971452561%
Multi-Core
2325
70.39055404178019%
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.