Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon E5-2637 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 1724 days newer than Xeon E5-2637 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 6% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 712 vs 672 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 45 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 45 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |