Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon E5-2637 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 1904 days newer than Xeon E5-2637 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 135 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 219 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 64 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $1,555 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1127
68.8875305623472%
Multi-Core
4210
30.054254711593376%
Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |