Buy on Amazon
$98.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $996
Availability
MSRP in USD: $996
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon E5-2637 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2637 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 2 than Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 134 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 4-core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon RX Graphics
Buy for $98.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2637 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2637 v3 or Ryzen 5 3400G
HITMAN 2, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
47 FPS
$17.64/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 5 3400G
8 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$829
In Stock
34 FPS
$20.56/FPS
Radeon RX Vega 11
Ryzen 5 3400G
16 GB, 240 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$699
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
