Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 1022 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 55 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 350 vs 333 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 20 vs 16 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
350
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$392.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $392.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |