Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600
- Performs up to 24% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 151 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-13600
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
868
35.61756257693886%
Multi-Core
4461
35.91787439613526%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
