Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 8945HS outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 8945HS is 3376 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
- Performs up to 23% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 150 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 8945HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
868
36.639932460953986%
Multi-Core
4461
38.55661192739844%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
