Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 3376 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 193 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 28 vs 55 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
868
35.056542810985455%
Multi-Core
4461
42.20435193945128%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
