Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 490 days older than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 60 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 7% better in Dota 2 than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 176 vs 165 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44035 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
426
60.25459688826026%
Multi-Core
2198
89.02389631429729%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |