Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1220 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 66% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 151 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 35 vs 60 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |