Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 363 days older than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 119 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 55 vs 60 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $91.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66726 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
426
81.14285714285714%
Multi-Core
2198
100%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |