Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9800X outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9800X is 2418 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2630 - 174 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 16 vs 12 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2630
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | Intel Core i7-9800X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
