Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 85 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 237 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$460.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $460.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |