Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 372 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 80 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 19% better in HITMAN 2 than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 132 vs 111 FPS
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
