Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2135 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 20% better in Far Cry 6 than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 112 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2436 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |