Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1547 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-2620 - 232 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 16 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
232
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5538 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |