Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4460 is 796 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 10% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2620 - 244 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
400
38.05899143672693%
Multi-Core
1945
66.4275956284153%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 84 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |